Contributions to Indian Sociology

 

Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

Click here to sign up for SAGE Journal Email Alerts today!

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Charsley, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati  
What's this?
Contributions to Indian Sociology, Vol. 32, No. 2, 527-549 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/006996679803200216

Sanskritization: The career of an anthropological theory

Simon Charsley

Department of Sociology, Adam Smith Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8RT, UK

The paper sketches the origins and development of one of the most widely influential of anthropological contributions to thinking about Indian society, 'Sanskritization', tracing its sources and its evolution in the thought of M.N. Srinivas, its author. As a process, he identified it first in his work as a student of G.S. Ghurye on 1930's rural Mysore. The roots and the form of this identification are examined. The theory was named and proclaimed in his classic Religion and society among the Coorgs, based on his Ph.D. work for Ghurye which he had reworked under the influence of Radcliffe-Brown's structural functionalism. Appearing thus, its original limited base was hidden: it was no longer a theory about Mysore society but about India in general, and indeed India resurgent in the era of Independence. Two diverging theses developed, linked by the centrality of the Brahman. One, seminal for future theoretical development, introduced social mobility into caste analysis; the other, more politically significant, was on the integration of Indian society. The paper discusses the subsequent development of the theory and, in a postscript, the way in which it reappears at the centre of current ideological oppositions.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
V. Sinha
Problematizing Received Categories: Revisiting 'Folk Hinduism' and 'Sanskritization'
Current Sociology, January 1, 2006; 54(1): 98 - 111.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Journal of Social ArchaeologyHome page
N. Boivin
Orientalism, ideology and identity: Examining caste in South Asian archaeology
Journal of Social Archaeology, June 1, 2005; 5(2): 225 - 252.
[Abstract] [PDF]